A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of fraud is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On October 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. in the Daegu District Court’s Sexual Branch, and the judgment was finalized on January 7, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 4, 2015, the injured Defendant written the written indictment at the Drupbry room located in Dao-si around 13:00 on the same day, which appears to be a clerical error, although it appears to be a clerical error.

In order to receive a demand from the victim E (n, 53 years of age) who dices alcohol together with the Defendant to calculate the drinking value at the time, the victim said, “I will pay the drinking value to the victim. I will pay the drinking value,” and the victim stated, “I would like to dyp and move in the inside. I would have to do so. I would have to do so.” The victim dyp the face of the defendant, and plicked the victim's hump to the face.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the right side salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. On January 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was asked by a police officer belonging to the police station in Seongbuk-gu, Chungcheongnam-do to appear in relation to the facts constituting a crime set forth in paragraph (1) by threatening the victim E (the age of 53) to cancel the complaint; (b) on January 27, 2015, the Defendant was asked for a phone call from F, who is the victim’s seat on the unclaimed land on January 27, 2015; and (c) on the phone call from F, who is the victim’s seat on the unclaimed land on January 27, 2015, the Defendant was called “the G criminal call inside the today; (d) the Defendant was released from the female test; (e) the Defendant was inside the country, and (e) the Defendant was able to leave the hospital, and (e) the inside the police station exceeded 10 years after he left the police station.

“Around 17:00 on the same day, F had the victim deliver the above words to the victim.”

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of cancelling a criminal complaint in relation to his criminal case investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Investigation reports (the details of telephone conversationss with victims and victims);