beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On January 22, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on January 22, 201, at Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C head office, and (b) on the ground that the victim D (Nam, 43 years of age) took place due to the above head-facing and drinking value, the Defendant was suffering from the victim’s face, hair, etc. on drinking, thereby undermining the victim’s face, hair, etc., for about two weeks of treatment; and (c) on the part of the victim.
2. Determination
A. The defense counsel and the defendant asserted consistently from the investigative agency to this court, and they asserted that the victim D followed the head of a hoff house with the drinking value problem, followed the victim D's desire to scam, and scam the chest part of the victim two times, but they did not inflict an injury upon the victim when the victim's face, head, etc. can be taken over as stated in the facts charged.
B. (1) Determination is difficult to believe that the witness D’s legal statement and the statement at the prosecution, which seem to correspond to the facts charged, are different from the police’s statement immediately after the instant case (see January 23, 2011) where the most memory is born and the truth is less contaminated.
(2) Rather, the police statement of D on January 23, 201 (the statement statement) was made by D on September 24, 201, and D, as a matter of the drinking price, D was sprinked by the Defendant, with the defect of the head and time expenses, and D’s left shoulder, but 2 male, who appeared to be the Defendant’s one’s own act, assault D, and sponsed D and escaped, the two male, who continued to run, sponsed D’s head, and sponsed D’s head by hand, and sponsed D’s left hand, and sponsed D’s face by the police statement of September 24, 2011. However, even if D’s head was followed by the police statement of September 24, 2011, the Defendant was unable to shoulder D’s body, and it seems that the Defendant’s body and sponsed D’s face would be well known where the Defendant obtained it.
(and it is unclear whether the above two persons are the defendant's behaviors).