Of the facts charged in the judgment of the defendant [2017 order 4643], the crime is punished by imprisonment for six months and [2017 order 5085].

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On April 6, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for a crime of intimidation at the Daejeon District Court on April 14, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 14, 2017. On September 28, 2017, the same court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for an injury, etc. and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 22, 2017.

[2017 Highest 4643] The defendant was placed in a position to be punished in a pending trial by the victim C due to a case brought by the victim C, and E, the mother of the victim D, had a good appraisal of the victims for the convenience of the victim C.

1. In around September 15, 2017, the Defendant threatened the victim by stating, “The victim, prior to the Gpenta operated by the victim C, who was in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, “I will make the victim she would see if she would she would she she she will she only she would her if she would she she would she her, if she would she would she she she would she sat down a bridge, and will not sat down her she would sat down she would leave shesat down to the vehicular road.”

2. The Defendant continues to exist at the time, time, and place of the insult as described in the preceding paragraph, and to the victim D’s mother E in that place “whether he has ever been seated for the same year as the head of the Ban as the head of the Ban.

“Isher desire to do so from the injured party by probing the Si expenses”

“ When hearing the word “,” the name of C and girls’ husband H and her husband who was playing in the pentthy, and the name of 20 customers on the name of 20 customers on the penty, she is a large interest, and she she she flick with “low flick flick flick and flick flick.”

“Publicly insulting the victim.”

[2017 Highest 5085] The Defendant and the victim E are the same neighboring company, and the Defendant, with respect to the case against which the Defendant filed a complaint from C for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media), is dissatisfied with the victim’s statement favorable to C at an investigative agency, etc., and use the Defendant’s mobile phone around December 10, 2016.