logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.02.12 2018가단10141
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 97,400,00 to the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 23, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 10, 2017, the Defendant entered into a subcontract for construction with the terms of subcontracting the construction cost of KRW 176,000,000 (including value-added tax) from April 17, 2017 to September 30, 2017, among the new construction works for accommodation facilities on land outside D and two parcels, for which the Plaintiff was awarded a contract with the Plaintiff on April 10, 2017, the Defendant agreed that the construction work period of KRW 216,00,000 (including value-added tax) shall be 216,00,000,000 for the construction cost of September 8, 2017, the construction period of April 17, 2017 to April 5, 2018, respectively.

B. On September 20, 2017, the Defendant entered into a subcontract for construction works with the term of 136,00,000 won for the construction work (including value-added tax) from September 20, 2017 to October 30, 2017, and entered into an agreement with the Plaintiff to subcontract construction works with the term of 14,40,000 won for the construction work on October 16, 2017 (including value-added tax), with the construction work price of 145,40,000 won for October 30, 2017 (including value-added tax), with the construction price of 145,40,000 won for the construction work price of 145,400,000 won, October 30, 2017 to April 5, 2018, and each of the defect warranty period changes to the warranty period.

C. The Plaintiff completed all of the foregoing Tyl and the sanitary instrument construction, and the above-type accommodation building was completed on April 5, 2018.

Around July 17, 2018, upon receiving the Plaintiff’s claim for construction cost, the Defendant responded to the purport that the Plaintiff would pay the unpaid construction cost as soon as possible, because it was difficult for the Plaintiff to receive the remainder due to the closing with C Co., Ltd., an executory company, due to its failure to pay the said construction cost.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence 2-1 through 4, Gap evidence 3, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the defendant's total amount of 361,40,000 won and the total of 361,40,000 won and the total of 361,40,000 won and 145,400.

arrow