logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.11 2017가단5159685
퇴직금 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) is a company that manufactures and sells “F clothes” products, and the Defendant is a newly incorporated company established through the D division on November 1, 2018, which succeeded to the assets and liabilities related to the manufacture and sale of textile products, such as D’s clothes, as determined by the division plan, and took over the instant lawsuit.

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” regardless of whether it was before or after the division. (b)

The Defendant entered into a special purchase contract with the department store operating companies of G and H, etc. with the contents that the Defendant would dispatch to the department store operating companies, supplied the clothing products produced by the Defendant to the department store, sold them, and paid the Defendant the remainder of sales proceeds after deducting a certain amount of fees from the sales proceeds, and the manpower to carry out the sales business within the department store were to be dispatched by

Plaintiff

A Work Point on August 14, 2003 at the end of work, A A on November 12, 2014, H H J J Ha-dong Point B B B of H on March 14, 2014, March 31, 2017, I Pyeongtaek-dong C of I on March 31, 2017, March 30, 2017.

C. In order to supply and sell products to the department stores pursuant to the above special contract purchase contract, the Defendant entered into a sales agency contract with the Plaintiffs on the terms that the Plaintiffs sell and inventory the Defendant’s products at the stores designated in the department stores, and as a result, receive a certain ratio of sales agency fees from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant sales agency contract”).

The Plaintiffs entered into the above contract with the Defendant and registered its business, and thereafter worked as a store manager under the above contract, and the period of service and the store in which they worked are as follows.

The part related to this case in the sales agency contract of this case is as shown in the attached Form.

(Business Place, Term of Contract, and Fees are common to the plaintiffs). [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and Gap Nos. 2, 3, and 2.

arrow