Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C On September 29, 2011, the Daegu District Court rendered a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of false accusation in 10 months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 7, 2011.

On June 17, 201, from around 19:00 to 19:40 on the same day, the Defendants held a general meeting of the N District Urban Development Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “N District Association”) in the second floor conference room of H hotel located in the north-gu G in the north-gu Seoul-si, and decided that Defendant A was the head of the association of this case by holding a general meeting of the N District Urban Development Project Association (hereinafter referred to as “this case association”) in the capacity of the Speaker pro tempore of this case.

However, in fact, the authority to hold the general meeting and to proceed with the meeting of the union is the president of the union, and at the time, the president of the union was the president of the union at the time. At around 18:00 on the same day, he held the general meeting of the union at the second floor of the H hotel at around 19:00, and at around 19:00 on the same day, Defendant A did not have the authority to hold the provisional general meeting

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to hold an invalid general meeting on July 15, 201, and held the general meeting of the association, and submitted to the Daegu District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Office and a letter of delegation 91 in the names of union members containing the minutes of the association and the forged letter of delegation 23 copies, and dismissed the directors, P, and auditor who were the head of the association of this case. Defendant A entered false facts in the association register of this case, which is the original copy of the notarial deed, and exercised the registration by having the association register, which is the original copy of the notarial deed, keep the register in its place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect examination of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to theO, K, T, U,V, W, X, Y, Z, and AA;

1. An investigation report (a letter of delegation, etc. regarding the exercise of the right to vote), an investigation report (a letter of delegation, etc. submitted to a complainant), an investigation report (in relation to attachment to a list of members), the submission of a report on investigation to the complainant, suspension of the execution of duties, and the like