1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) from August 25, 2015 to September 3, 2016, the monthly amount of KRW 164,000,000, and its amount of KRW 1,000.

1. Claim against the defendant B

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the grounds for the claims in attached Form;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The authenticity of the entire document is presumed to have been established as a whole because there is no special dispute between the parties that the stamp image after the defendant C’s name will be affixed to the above defendant C (hereinafter “C”)’s claim Nos. 2-1 (the stamp image after the defendant C’s name will be affixed with the above defendant’s seal). Although the defendant B asserted that he/she, without authority, by using the representative director name of the defendant C, he/she prepared a loan certificate and affixed the seal of the defendant C, it is not sufficient to recognize the facts of the defendant C’s assertion only with the evidence Nos. 1, 2-2, 3, 4, and 5-2, and the above evidence Nos. 2-1, 200,000 won, and the defendant C’s interest rate of KRW 5,000,000,000 to the above defendant C’s last 16,000,0000 won, and the defendant’s interest rate of KRW 16,016,0,016.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.