A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 17:55 on April 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, during the period of Ansan-si, the Defendant: (b) received a 112 report that the passengers were frighting, and received a 112 report that he was frighting, the C District security guards of the police station would listen to the self frighting from the Defendant; (c) expressed that “D would be frighting to fright the opening fright; (d) frighting to fright to fright to fright; and (d) fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright the frighting of D; and (d) committed assault by the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers such as on-site mobilization and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including photographs attached thereto);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as per the Disposition, taking into consideration the following: (a) there is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and 4 months); (b) there is no previous criminal sentence; and (c) there is no criminal conviction or heavier than the suspended sentence.