logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1967. 12. 18. 선고 66다2382,2383 판결
[입목소유권확인등본소참가소][집15(3)민,360]
Main Issues

(a) Method of acquisition of the ownership of standing timber;

B. Whether a person who has conducted the last method of trading standing timber can claim ownership of the person who has conducted the method of trading standing timber;

Summary of Judgment

If standing timber is purchased separately from the forest land group and the person to whom the ownership is transferred obtains the ownership of standing timber by marking "no owner of any forest land" at the same place of forest land, it cannot be said that it is insufficient to obtain the ownership of standing timber.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 188 of the Civil Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Kim Dong-dong et al.

Defendant-Appellee

Escopic type

Intervenor of Party, Appellee

Kim Young-chul

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 66Na41, 42 delivered on October 19, 1966

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The grounds for appeal by two parties such as the plaintiff, etc. and the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff, etc. shall be examined.

On August 13, 1963, the court below held that the intervenor purchased standing timber from the non-party who is the former owner of the forest and field on this case, and decided that the plaintiff's purchase of the standing timber from the non-party who is the owner of the forest and field on this case, and decided that the plaintiff's purchase of the standing timber from the non-party who purchased the forest and field from the non-party who purchased it from the non-party who purchased it, and that the non-party's purchase of the standing timber from the non-party who purchased it from the non-party who purchased it was ordered to change the ownership of the standing timber, and that the non-party's purchase of the standing timber from the non-party who purchased it from the non-party who purchased it from the non-party who purchased it from the non-party, and that the non-party's purchase of the standing timber from the non-party's non-party's purchase of the standing timber from the non-party's purchase of the standing timber by the non-party's new statement (see, 197).

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

[Judgment of the Supreme Court (Presiding Justice) Na-dong, Ma-dong, and Ma-dong, the last Ma-man

arrow