1. On July 11, 2017, the Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2017Kaba33 decided on the Defendants’ lawsuit costs against the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4 (including number), the Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2017Kao33, which the defendants filed against the plaintiff, issued each order on July 11, 2017 and July 25, 2017. The decision dated July 11, 2017 was revoked by the ruling of July 25, 2017. The decision of July 25, 2017, which was determined as KRW 2,886,352, the amount of litigation expenses to be borne by the plaintiff against the defendant Eul was determined as KRW 1,924,738, respectively, and the amount of litigation expenses to be borne by the defendants against each of the above defendants was determined as KRW 2,86,738, Feb. 25, 2018, and the fact that the defendants filed an application for compulsory auction by the defendant on July 25, 2018.

As above, the decision made on July 11, 2017 was revoked in accordance with the decision made on July 25, 2017, and since the Defendants’ claims against the Plaintiff and their enforcement costs were fully paid in accordance with the decision made on July 25, 2017, compulsory execution based on the decision made on July 11, 2017 and the decision made on July 25, 2017 should be dismissed.

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.

(The costs of litigation are to be borne by the Plaintiff in consideration of the fact that the Plaintiff deposited the cost of execution after the instant lawsuit and the Defendants withdrawn the compulsory auction case).