logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.18 2018고단675
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on February 17, 2017.

The defendant is a real estate development company (State) C Vice-Chairperson and (State) D representative director.

On March 13, 2014, the Defendant is scheduled to perform large-scale construction works to the Victim F at the (State D) D office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, with the Victim F.

The construction site project site contract was concluded with 16 billion won, and H construction and construction contract was concluded.

When completion is completed, I already talked with the sale of buildings in lots from I.

B. On May 2014, 2014, the contract deposit amount of 100 million won will be the civil engineering works of 15 billion won.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the above project site was concluded between J and K (State) on November 3, 2007, but there was no specific plan for the progress of the project due to the failure of J (State) on around November 2008, when the above project site was entered into a sales contract of 9.2 billion won, but there was no specific plan for the progress of the project. The above land was not transferred from K (State) because it was not repaid 6.7 billion won due to the loan of the above land as security, and no H construction was entered into a contract with H construction and construction contract. The loan interest was paid by succession of the above 6.7 billion won from L (State) on the loan guarantee liability for the above 6.7 billion won from L (State) on December 3, 2008, and since the above land was registered as the right to request the transfer of ownership in the name of L (State), the defendant did not have any intention or ability to perform the development project.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he received 100 million won from the victim as the contract deposit money on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Fact confirmation, civil engineering service ordering contract, a detailed statement of payment of land C, a sale contract including real estate, and a construction contract agreement 1.

arrow