A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:30 on June 30, 2015, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence located in Jeju-si, who was asked questions from the Defendant’s child about the slope E belonging to the Jeju-dong Police Station D Zone D District of the Jeju-dong Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving the report from the Defendant’s child, and the circumstances of the report, committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant stated, “I reported to be known; (b) No. she reported to be cut; and (c) son; and (d) the Defendant was able to take two times to the victims by gathering an empty disease next to the Defendant’s domestic violence.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention and suppression of the above E and F, wearing police uniforms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The sentencing guidelines for the sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the suspended sentence are as follows: The sentencing guidelines for the sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the sentencing guidelines for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the obstruction of performance of official duties, the first category (the coercion of obstruction of performance of official duties), the basic area, the imprisonment from June to April 1): The facts of the crime are recognized and reflected in the sentence, which is advantageous to the execution of the sentence, and the defendant's age, character, environment, etc. is disadvantageous to the fact that there was no record of criminal punishment except for the summary order imposed on the crime of violation of the Road Act on February 28, 2002: The motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc.