The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two years of suspended execution, observation of protection, 40 hours’ mental psychology and violence therapy in the period of eight months of imprisonment) is too uneasy and unreasonable.

2. It is an unfavorable circumstance that the victim used violence against many victims without any particular reason, the degree of injury of the victim D, the victim's damage did not recover from the victims except the victim D, and the remaining victims are punished by the defendant.

However, it seems that the above victim was not subject to the punishment of the defendant, it appears that the victim committed a contingent crime because it was unable to properly treat a mental disease suffering from the ordinary level of suffering, and that it would be more effective to the edification and the prevention of recidivism by undergoing a strict observation of protection than that of the defendant. It seems that the family members of the defendant are able to assist the defendant in the treatment, reflects the crime, and do not have any criminal record exceeding the fine.

In addition, in consideration of the motive and background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the theory of changes, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because the sentence of the court below is too uneasible.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.