A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 15, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution due to the crime of uttering of an investigation document at the Suwon District Court on January 15, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 23, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

On December 11, 2014, the Defendant was a person who was working in C, a subordinate company of C, was aware of the victim E (the age of 40) and his business with the director of C, and was accused of fraud from the victim on December 11, 2014.

1. The Defendant written indictment of this case around December 19, 2014 stated the date of the crime as “Around December 17, 2014.” However, on the record, the Defendant sent a letter by registered mail around December 19, 2014, and the Defendant did not dispute the fact that the letter was sent to the Defendant, thereby correcting it ex officio.

In the Suwon-si Suwon-si Suwon-si detention center, “The victim would know about the fact that he received merchandise coupons, the fact that it was between studal harassment, and other misconducts. As there is a contract in which he invested in the illegal soil site, this will be tried. It will be done. It will be done more. It will be done. It will be done. It will be done if there is a letter that the contract was made in the above C company’s audit room and the surrounding people. It will be done. It will be resolved to cancel the complaint before the internal release on bail.” The letter was drawn up and sent to C in the Pyeongtaek-siF, which

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of having the victim cancel the complaint in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

2. Around 18:00 on December 19, 2014, the Defendant told the Defendant to the effect that “I would know to the investigation agency of the fact that I would have invested in the illegal sports territory without the withdrawal of the complaint. I would know to the investigation agency of the fact that D would have invested in the illegal sports territory.”

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of having the victim cancel the complaint in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness E’s legal statement 1.