A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2019 Highest860]

1. On March 25, 2019, the Defendant: (a) driven a e-car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.128% at a section of about 3km from the 20:37 Mapo-si to the Do preceding the Do in front of the Bapo-si and the Do preceding the Do in the Do in the mutual infri-si Mapo-si Mapo-si.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury to Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving motor vehicles E;

On March 25, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 20:37, while driving the said car, the Defendant immediately driven the three-lane road in front of the G High School F at the time of F at the time of F, with the 3-lane square from the shooting distance of the stadium to the 3-lane square.

At the time, it is a three-lane road in which signal lights are installed at night and at the front of the road, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents with other vehicles running ahead by accurately manipulating the steering gear and operating the steering system, as well as the front and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the above body, the Defendant classified the two-lanes into two-lanes. The Defendant was negligent in driving a vehicle in a situation where normal operation is difficult, such as putting a redlight belt on the face, and neglecting the duty of front-time navigation, and by wrong operation of the brake system, by negligence, the part of the front part of the said vehicle, which was driven by the victim H(27 years of age) who stops in front of the crosswalk for waiting signal in front of the crosswalk, was shocked by the i30 vehicle behind the vehicle in front of the crosswalk, and the two-lanes continued immediately after changing the two-lane lines, and the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the victim J(58 years of age) who was driving in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment to the above H.