The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around 00:01 on October 31, 201, the Defendant: (a) at the front of the “Fju” store located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Victim G (hereinafter “Fju”); (b) at the front of the “Fju” store in Guro-gu, Seoul; (c) while the Victim G said that the Victim G “I” was wd, the Victim G said that “I would be hurged; and (d) the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object from the scene, was laid down on the floor; and (d) laid the beer’s disease on the floor, which is a dangerous object from the scene; and (e) laid it over to the victims for about two (2) weeks to provide the victims with approximately two (2) weeks of medical treatment; and (e) put the Victim I at the open top of the part of the arms that requires two (2) weeks of medical treatment.

2. Although at the time of the defendant's assertion, the defendant had broken the beer's disease, the defendant did not injure the victims due to a shoulderer beer's disease.

3. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the body fighting between the defendant and the victims was found at the date and time stated in the facts charged, and the victims suffered injury, such as the statements in the facts charged.

However, with regard to whether the above injury suffered by the victims was caused by the Defendant, the victim G, I's each legal statement and the statement in the investigative agency, which are direct evidence of this, are inconsistent with the victim G, I's each legal statement and the statement in the investigation agency, as well as the time and circumstances the Defendant suffered from the injury, and whether the Defendant used it at the time of the injury, are not clear. In addition, the CCTV images do not coincide with the CCTV images installed near the site of this case. In light of CCTV images, while the Defendant first fightd with G while carrying the body while holding it back to the victim, he was able to take the Defendant again as the front side of the head of the door, and thereafter, G went to G again, and the person who appears in I in the middle of this case should not be able to get the Defendant's arms.