1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

In the first instance court’s judgment, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the retrial ruling rendered in relation to the case of the dismissal as stated in the purport of the claim and the case of an application for reexamination for remedy of unfair labor practices (hereinafter “instant retrial ruling”). The first instance court revoked the remainder of the judgment, excluding the portion related to the unfair dismissal against C, D, E, F, G, H, I, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N (hereinafter “C, etc.”), and dismissed the remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim.

Since only the defendant appealed against the plaintiff, the part of the claim seeking the cancellation of the part concerning the rejection of unfair dismissal against 12 persons, such as C, in the retrial decision of this case, was excluded from the scope of the adjudication of this court.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part concerning which appeal is made under paragraph (3) below. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420

(A) The grounds for appeal by the Defendant do not differ significantly from the contents of the Defendant’s assertion in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court and in this court are examined, the first instance court’s decision rejecting the Defendant’s argument is justifiable). The part of the first instance court’s decision, which was written, dismissed “W” in the first instance court’s 1, 4, 10, and 11 as “S”.

Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance, "1. 20." in Part 14 shall be used as "12. 20." and part 10 of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by "2. 20. 20. 20." in Part 10 of the judgment of the first instance by " until February 2015. 20."

No. 23 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, the term "affiliated with the plaintiff" in the first instance judgment shall be applied to "affiliated with the company of this case".

No. 25 of the first instance judgment, "No. 8" of the first instance judgment was added to "No. 8, 11 through 14, 19 through 26, 29, 31 through 36, 39 through 45."

In conclusion, the remainder of this case, excluding the part on unfair dismissal against 12 persons such as C, etc.