1. Of the instant lawsuits, the claims of Plaintiffs C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and L are dismissed, respectively.

2. The remaining plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relevant Defendant Co., Ltd. Korea Insurance Agency (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is an insurance agency dealing with insurance products of multiple insurers. Defendant A and B jointly operate the Defendant M branch of the company (hereinafter “instant branch”). N from May 2013 to September 2014, as an insurance solicitor of the instant branch.

B. The insurance contract under the name of the plaintiffs in the name of the insurance contract under the name of the plaintiffs (hereinafter "Korean Commercial Life Co., Ltd.") entered into each insurance contract (hereinafter "each insurance contract of this case") entered in the name of "B" column in attached Table 2 as of the date stated in the "B" column in attached Table 2, and all of them are recruited N.

C. On April 29, 2015, Defendant A and B filed a complaint with N on April 29, 2015, stating that “N had no intention to solicit insurance normally, and requested Defendant A and B to pay the volume of insurance solicitors in lump sum, using the existing customer’s name, during the period from October 2013 to September 2014, Defendant A and B concluded a false insurance contract using the former customer’s name, and then received insurance premium, which was to be paid in installments several times at one time, and then received total of KRW 456,80,00 as an insurance solicitor’s allowance in a way that terminates the insurance contract.” However, the prosecutor of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office at the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office requested a detention warrant against N on the criminal facts as seen above, but the above accusation case was also subject to the prosecution’s false prosecution without being detained on August 26, 2017.”