Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who committed the crime on September 6, 201, committed on September 6, 201, using the Kakao Stockholm to the victim B (27 years old) at Flux on September 6, 2011.

230,000 won shall be paid with the loan.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 230,000 won from the victim to his agricultural bank account around that time.

2. On September 12, 2011, the Defendant committed the crime of Sep. 12, 201, using the Kakao Stockholm to the Kakao Stockholm for the foregoing victim’s discharge on September 12, 2011.

If a hospital fee of KRW 200,000 is lent, it shall be paid with money on the 15th of each month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received KRW 200,000 from the victim to his agricultural bank account around that time.

3. From September 12, 2011 to September 19, 2011, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) in the mutual French coffee shop located in the Young-si, Youngwon-si, Youngwon-si on September 12, 2011, the Defendant: (b) the said victim “the discharge of the Cho Jong-si shall be in the same manner as our house; and (c) the goods to be used by the Cho Jong-si are necessary.

It is intended to fully pay 4,30,000 won by the 15th of each month from the purchase price and transfer of the card.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price or the above 430,000 won.

The Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) received one copy of Samsung Card from the victim on the same day; and (c) subsequently purchased goods equivalent to KRW 5,066,320 of the market price over 49 times, such as the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, and (d) had the victim pay the price to the victim; and (b) acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police of the defendant.