logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.11.25 2019고단1101
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Each request for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 1101"

1. Around December 2013, the Defendant made a false statement with regard to the victim B, stating, “The Defendant would give the victim an employment to G companies with 45 million won as a main agent in the G companies located in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any person who could have been employed by the victim in the above company, and was willing to use the money received from the victim to repay personal obligations, such as bonds and card payments, rather than employment solicitation. Therefore, even if receiving money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to have the victim work properly

Around December 18, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the H bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant, and obtained KRW 123,850,000 from that time on 13 occasions under the name of employment expenses, such as the statement in the attached crime list 1.

2. On June 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim “a person who knows in the G company and is employed by the G company” on the street in front of the “K Hospital,” which is located in the jurisdiction of the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Gunn-si. The defendant made a false statement to the effect that “a person who knows in the G company will be employed by requesting the person who knows in the face of KRW 60 million.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any person who could have been employed by the victim in the above company, and was willing to use the money received from the victim to repay personal obligations, such as bonds and card payments, rather than employment solicitation. Therefore, even if receiving money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to have the victim work properly

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 30 million won from the victim’s wife account (N) around June 10, 2016 from the victim, under the name of the Defendant’s wife to transfer 30 million won under the name of employment expenses, and received 55 million won in total on four occasions under the name of employment expenses, such as the attached list 2.

arrow