The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is to compel C to prosecute the other party through persons who are aware of the prosecutor's office.

The Defendant’s assertion is without merit, since the Defendant received KRW 3 million from C on the ground that he/she received KRW 3 million from C on the ground that he/she received KRW 2 million from C on the ground that the Defendant received KRW 3 million from C on the ground that he/she received a request or good offices for a case that he/she received from C on the ground that the Defendant received KRW 3 million on the ground that the Defendant received a request or good offices for a case that he/she received from C on the basis of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court:

A. C In an investigative agency, “A will have the other party to the case on which C filed a complaint.”

At the same time, around November 16, 2015, 300,000 won was demanded and 300,000 won was presented in front of the check, and the Defendant stated to the effect that the Defendant would be responsible for and resolve the case.

나. 피고인은 2015. 12. 12. C에게 “ 형님, 죄송해서 찾아뵙지도 못하고 전화도 못 드렸습니다

I have known that “the detailed date should not be detained” and “I have known that the detailed date should not be detained.”

It is the world that “n't know what he does,” and it was contacted with the past week that the case of the prosecutor’s office is well known, but it was not able to speak in a crime of thickness.

”, “ 새로운 증거 없이는 사건을 뒤집는다는 것이 힘들다는 건 알았지만..”, “ 형님. 계좌 번호 찍어 주시고 몇 일 시간을 주시면 입금해 드리고 찾아뵙도록 하겠습니다

The message sent “(61 page of the evidence record)” to the effect that the Defendant received KRW 3 million as the subject matter for resolution, but did not conclude as desired, and that it would be returned to C.