logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.10 2014고정3796
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall place any indication or advertisement that is likely to mislead or confuse the quality, ingredients, etc. of foods, etc. with the efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or with medicines, etc.

Nevertheless, on February 2014, the Defendant advertised that “Aro 100,” which he sold in the Internet shopping mall (Gmkeet), “Aroman 100,” had the effect of preventing and treating diseases by strengthening the function between active acids and the removal of toxins, preventing deterioration, and increasing the immunity. The Defendant prevented the climatic roll and increased the carbon strength of the blood center, thereby expanding the blood center. As such, the Defendant published the aforementioned products together with the aforementioned pictures to the effect of preventing and preventing various adult diseases, such as urology, high blood pressure, etc. by raising the volume of the insulgic generation, and thereby raising the sulgrosis, thereby raising the efficacy and efficacy of the disease prevention and treatment, or causing mistake and confusion as medicine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accusation of businesses violating the Food Sanitation Act;

1. Article 94(1)2-2, and Article 13(1)1 of the Food Sanitation Act (amended by Act No. 12496, Mar. 18, 2014); the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow