logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2020.09.09 2020가단52062
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 23,173,977 for Plaintiff A and each of them on July 9, 2018 for Plaintiff B, C, and D.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff A is the spouse of the deceased G (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Plaintiff B, C, and D are the deceased’s children.

B. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Hone Star Vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicles”).

C. At around 19:30 on July 8, 2018, I, the owner of the instant vehicle, stopped the instant vehicle on the side in the vicinity of the bus stop located in the 77-1 bus stop located in the former, Newannam-gun, Seoul-gun, the pressure of the subdivision of the instant vehicle, and operated the instant vehicle, and the deceased was dead due to pressure on brain, cerebral thalopsis, thalopsis, and thalopical thalopsis, around July 20, 2018.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

On November 29, 2018, the prosecutor of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office decided not to prosecute I for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death) against I for the following reasons.

(1) The facts that the suspect (I) and the victim (the deceased) were in a relationship with each other, the fact that the suspect and the victim were women's problems, the victim was working under the contract under the contract of free trade for women, the victim was driving a road adjacent to the subdivision of the new-nam-gun, Haan-gun, Nan-gun, Nannam-gun, with a view to a suspect's driving on and from the Hland, and the victim died of brain pressure around July 20, 2018 in the course of being treated differently from the road on the top of the steering of the above vehicle, and the fact that there was no blood trace reaction in the vehicle inside and outside of the above vehicle, and that there was no physical trauma of the victim, respectively.

(2) 피의자는 피해자가 커피를 마시자고 하여 함께 압해 방면으로 가고 있었는데 피해자가 여자관계를 의심하는 말을 하여 말다툼을 하게 되어 목포 방면으로 유턴하여 진행하던 중 피해자가 안전벨트를 풀고 문을 열고 내리려고 하여 여러 번 제지하였으나 차를 멈췄다 다시 출발하는 과정에서 피해자가...

arrow