logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.10.26 2015가단211691
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff B's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff A's claim is dismissed.

3. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 6, 1981, F. The F.M. 1,617 square meters and G field 1,134 square meters (only the lot number is indicated) were to be subject to restoration registration in H land. The land was divided into F.1,856 square meters, G field 1,134 square meters, and G field 1,134 square meters before F. The land was divided into F. F. 264 square meters, G field 59 square meters, and J field 59 square meters, and G land into G field 595 square meters and J field 539 square meters.

F, I, G, J 토지는 별지 도면 표시 ㈐, ㈑, ㈒, ㈓와 같다.

B. On October 5, 1981, the Plaintiffs, K, and L had been owners at the time, and the land F before subdivision to the Gwangju Gun on October 5, 1981, the cadastral map was falsely prepared in the process of recovery, registration conversion, and cadastral map, and filed an application for revision of the registered matters, such as location, size, boundary, etc., within the D land, and the head of Gwangju Gun corrected F land and G land according to the current cadastral map

C. Plaintiff A is the owner of F, G, I, J land and D, and the Defendant is the owner of E land adjacent to D land.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 13 (including any number), the fact-finding results of this court's fact-finding, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. 원고들 주장의 요지 원고 A는 분할 전 G 토지 위에 건물을 신축하고자 광주시에 건축허가를 신청하여 건축허가를 받았고, 분할 전 F 토지는 별지 도면 표시 ㈎ 부분에, 분할 전 G 토지는 별지 도면 표시 ㈏ 부분에 위치하고 있었는데, 공사 과정에서 건물은 D 토지 지상에 건축되었다.

Plaintiff

A requested completion at the time of Gwangju, but the Gwangju City could not obtain approval for use because construction was completed unlike building permission, and the boundary between F and G land enters D land. Accordingly, the Plaintiff A made an application for land boundary correction in order to harmonize the construction act and obtain approval for use.

In light of the above circumstances, the foregoing shall be applied.

arrow