A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2015, at around 02:25, the Defendant brought the victim S(the age of 43) and the victim under the dispute between the Singu Q, Sungnam-si, into the “Rju store” inside the “Rju store”, on the ground that the victim had her anti-end and bathed, and knife (the total length of 30cm, 18cc in the knife length) and knife the victim’s knife part toward the part of the victim, and cut down the victim’s knife with approximately 100 meters of the victim’s knife, and caused damage to the victim’s left part of the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of S;

1. The victim, the injury part and field photograph, and investigation report (verification of the degree of injury);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing seized articles;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing [the scope of recommending sentence] under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (including favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing below), where the mitigated area (1 year and six months to six months), the mitigated area (1 year and six months), the punishment not (including advanced efforts to recover damage) or considerable damage (including advanced efforts to recover damage) of the mitigated area (1 year and six months), or the crime of this case is prescribed as imprisonment for a limited term of not less than three years; the defendant committed the crime of this case in this case; the defendant committed the crime of this case even if he had the history of punishment by violence, etc. over several occasions; the crime of this case was committed; in light of the contents of the crime of this case, the victim was committed with a knife; however, the crime of this case was determined as ordered in consideration of the agreement with the victim.