1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From November 3, 2016, the above real estate.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 13, 2016, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant, with the lease deposit of KRW 10 million, KRW 500,000 per month (payment on February 2), and the lease term from October 2, 2016 to October 1, 2018.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

However, the Defendant did not fully pay the Plaintiff monthly rent from November 3, 2016, when occupying and using the instant real estate in accordance with the instant lease agreement.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the payment of the overdue loan over several occasions, but the Defendant’s failure to implement it, thus notifying the Defendant of the intention to terminate the instant lease contract on the ground of the overdue loan at the time before and after the time of the instant lawsuit.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the instant lease contract was terminated by the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention of termination on the ground of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay the amount calculated by the rate of KRW 500,000 per month from November 3, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the said real estate as unjust enrichment equivalent to the unpaid rent or rent.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.