The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

One saw (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

1. According to the records on the summary of the grounds for appeal, the Defendant, after being sentenced to the judgment of the court below on May 2, 2019, did not submit a petition of appeal within the period for filing an appeal. On May 30, 2019, after the period for filing an appeal expires, the Defendant asserted unfair sentencing to the effect that “the Defendant shall submit the statement of grounds for appeal at an open trial by being lower than punishment and submit the statement of grounds for appeal at an open trial.”

However, insofar as the defendant did not submit a petition of appeal, the submission of the above statement of grounds for appeal and its statement cannot serve as a legitimate ground for appeal or appeal (where the submission of the grounds for appeal is deemed to be an appeal, it shall be dismissed by decision in accordance with Articles 362(1) and 360 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is apparent that an appeal has been filed after the termination of the right to appeal, and it shall be dismissed by decision in accordance with Articles 362(1) and 360 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but as long as the judgment of the court below is accepted by the prosecutor and reversed

The punishment sentenced by the court below (12 years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unhued and unfair.

2. The judgment of the defendant is a confession and reflect on all of the crimes of this case, and the defendant seems to have committed a crime resulting in death or injury of each of the present building of this case in a somewhat contingent and not participating in elegation because he was able to take a bath from the victim, etc., and the defendant also suffered some images due to the fire prevention crime of this case.

On the other hand, each of the present building and fire-prevention crimes of this case is a crime that spreads gasoline in a restaurant located in a large number of people, causes two victims to die, and causes three victims to suffer bodily injury. In light of the circumstances and contents of the crime, it is highly liable for the crime.