Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

around 04:50 on August 12, 2016, the Defendant driven B 3 automobiles while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.113% at the section of approximately 1.7km from the 1.7km to the coo electronic road located in the coo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the 840-dong unit.

On July 14, 2016, the Defendant driven BK3 car at a section of about 350 meters from the front day of the mutual unsurak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the front day of the sand internal market located in the Dong after the former, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.112% among the blood transfusion around 03:03, the Defendant driven BK3 car at the section of about 350 meters from the front day of the mutual unsurak-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City to the front day of the sand internal market located in the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 1479"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A report on detection of the driver of a vehicle driving, a report on the circumstances of the driver of the vehicle driving, and a ledger using the measuring instruments for drinking;

1. A report on internal investigation (two cases, including on-site conditions and the circumstances of voluntary accompanying) 2016 high-level 767;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the detection of suspected victims of violating traffic laws on roads;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking drivers and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the report on the circumstances of drinking drivers;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act repeats the same kind of crime within a short period of time for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the fact that the degree of alcohol in the driving of each drinking crime is not less than that of the Defendant’s disadvantage, considering the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment as a young young young person, and that it is difficult to repeat a crime by seriously against the mistake, the fine is selected by taking account of the fact that the young young young person does not have any record of criminal punishment, and the fact that he/she does not repeat a crime by taking account of the fact that he/she commits the wrong, and