logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.22 2016고정398
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who runs a life while running a call Ban business.

Where an owner of a motor vehicle intends to conduct a tubes on the items prescribed by Ordinance of Ministry of Construction and Transportation of national land, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of a Si/Gun

Nevertheless, without the approval of the head of the Gu on April 1, 2015, the Defendant violated the above matters to be observed, even though he knows that part of the internal partition walls of the B call line in the Incheon Airport located in the Jung-gu Incheon Airport, Jung-gu, Incheon, had been removed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the detection of violation of the Automobile Management Act (illegal alteration of structure- removal of partition walls);

1. A report on detection (Notification);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement photographs;

1. Article 81 Subparag. 19 and Article 34 of the former Automobile Management Act (amended by Act No. 13686, Dec. 29, 2015); the choice of a fine for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment appears to have been committed against the instant crime in order for the Defendant to carry more cargo while running the delivery business, and now his mistake is divided and reflected.

However, even though the Defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment for the suspicion of removing the wall of the instant vehicle without permission on around 2008, it seems that the Defendant operated the vehicle using the vehicle as it was for several years without restoring it to its original state.

The sentence shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as such factors of sentencing and the age, environment, sex, economic circumstances, etc. of the defendant.

arrow