The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the favorable circumstances that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, but the defendant was directly involved in the process of deception by taking office as the representative director in the name of a juristic person, knowing that it will be used for the crime of this case, the degree of participation in the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be negligible; the defendant did not agree with the victim or recover the damage caused by the crime of this case; there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below; the amount of fraud, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument and the records of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime of this case, it

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.