The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The Defendant did not assault the Victim E (Mymar Nationality, 34 years of age) on three occasions as stated in the facts charged.

(De Facto Error). The sentencing of the lower court (2 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

(F) In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant’s assertion on this part is without merit.

① The victim has made a very concrete and consistent statement to the effect that it conforms to the facts charged from the police to the court below.

F was at the time of assault on January 14, 2013, the police and the court below made a very specific and consistent statement to the effect that it conforms to the statements of the victim from the police to the court below.

② The Defendant’s statement about circumstances before and after the instant assault accords with the victim’s statement.

On August 27, 2012, the victim stated, “The victim shall unload floices (loaks) four up to four, but four transport by florings in the capacity. For this reason, the defendant was assaulted. After the defendant left the place, he was assaulted to the Suwon Employment Center.”

(No. 8 of the Evidence Records). The Defendant stated in the police that “at that time, she ought to come back by the speech. At the Suwon Employment Center, the Defendant was phoneed about the fact that she assaulted the victim and at that time there was no time to do so.”

(Evidence No. 27). The victim, on November 15, 2012, had "one Chinese person at his/her own time after withdrawal" as to the developments of the assault.

Although the Defendant intended to use this machine, I did not use it due to inconvenience.

Accordingly, the defendant assaultss the defendant.