1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. As from October 20, 2014, the delivery of the above building.

1. Facts of recognition and judgment

A. According to the facts without dispute over recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the plaintiff paid a monthly rent of five times from May 20, 2014 to October 20, 2014 to the defendant with the lease deposit of 30 million won, monthly rent of 1.5 million won (payment in advance on May 20, 2014 to May 19, 2016) (hereinafter "lease"), and the defendant occupied the apartment of this case on May 20, 2014 to the present date on the ground that the plaintiff sent the lease deposit of this case to the defendant for non-payment of five times from May 20, 2014 to October 20, 2014, and each of the above proof is acknowledged.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the lease of this case was terminated at the time of arrival of the defendant's expression of intention to terminate the lease of this case on the basis of rent-free delay at least two occasions, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the apartment of this case to the plaintiff, and to pay monthly rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of 1.5 million won per month from October 20, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the apartment of this case.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.