1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 19, 2018, while working in the Seogu Metropolitan City Seo-gu Police Station B, the Plaintiff asserted that “The Mau Pest infection of the Hague virus (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”) was diagnosed and applied for approval of medical care for official duties on January 23, 2019.

B. On July 30, 2019, the Defendant issued a medical care non-approval disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The instant injury and disease caused by infections causing the Hague virus is exposed to the Hague virus. In light of such medical characteristics and the cause of outbreak, etc., the instant injury and disease may not be deemed to have a proximate causal link with occupational route or stress, or that there was an inherent special cause that could cause the Plaintiff’s duties, and thus, it cannot be recognized that there was a proximate causal relation between the occupational branch of the instant case’s injury and disease” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. On December 16, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a petition for review with CSC. However, the said Committee dismissed the petition for review on the ground that “it is deemed that the Plaintiff had been in excess of duties, such as engaging in the duties of ballot-counting place guard on June 14, 2018, but the instant injury and disease occurred due to external factors, such as the reexamination, heat, reduction, and immunity, due to a recurrence of simple and simple spread, it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with official duties as a medical opinion.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that he applied it excessively to the Plaintiff’s free trade zone or applied it to it. After completing daily work on June 13, 2018 and completing the mobilization of expenses to the polling station on the following day, the Plaintiff did not suffer from the satise, reduction, etc., due to night work.