The defendants are all innocent.

1. Summary Order subject to Review and summary Order subject to summary Order: Violation of the facts charged of summary Order No. 1999 High Court Decision No. 1070 AB B B B B B 1999. 20 on Jan. 20, 17: No. 2001 High Court Decision No. 2001DaD 265 on May 29, 2001: No. 06: No. 28 national highways No. 28: No. 11999 EF No. 13: No. 207: No. 13: No. 20448, Dec. 24, 2003 high weight of weight No. 2044, Dec. 11, 203 high weight No. 2065, Dec. 27, 2004

2. As to each of the facts charged in the instant case, the public prosecutor filed a public prosecution by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005).

However, Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense pursuant to Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine pursuant to the corresponding Article," the Constitutional Court shall be punished by a fine pursuant to the corresponding Article."

Thus, since each of the facts charged in this case constitutes a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant shall be acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.