The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below found the defendant not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant colored stolen articles, but did not reach the number of larceny, among the charges of this case, on the ground that the court below found the defendant guilty of attempted robbery included in this part of the charges of this case, the court below found the defendant not guilty in this part of this part.

Therefore, since only the defendant appealed on the remaining part of the judgment of the court below excluding the acquittal portion of the reasons, the acquittal portion of the reasons is judged to have been exempted from the object of public defense among the parties in accordance with the principle of no appeal.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 90Do2820, Mar. 12, 1991). Accordingly, with respect to this part, the judgment of the court below is based on the theory of innocence, and only the guilty portion recognized by the court below is determined as follows.

(i) In other words, the judgment of the court below is not to be judged again on the acquittal portion of the judgment of the court below which makes the conclusion; 2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (three years of imprisonment) which the court below pronounced is too unreasonable.

3. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and against it, and that E, the victim of the crime of this case in 2014Dahap85 as stated in the judgment of the court below, wishes to find the defendant's wife by agreement with the defendant (the victim of paragraph (1) is D or D, D is a child of this case, and the crime of this case is also committed at the same time as the above crime of paragraphs (2) and 3, and the crime of paragraph (1) is committed at the same time as the above crime of paragraphs (2) and (3). The value of the stolen article by the defendant is relatively minor, and the victim's injury is relatively minor, and the victim's injury is not excessive, and the defendant appears to go to go to each of the crimes of this case in order to steals food while living together, and each of the crimes of this case has already become final and conclusive.