1. The Defendant’s KRW 90,000,000 as well as its annual 10% from May 25, 2016 to September 22, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence No. 1 and No. 2, and no other counter-proof exists.

On April 21, 2016, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 90,000,00 to the Defendant, and agreed with the Defendant as follows:

(hereinafter “instant contract”) KRW 90,000,000 (hereinafter “instant loan”)

The interest shall be KRW 750,000 per month (payment on February 25, 201) and from February 25, 2017, which shall be determined as consulting with the firstman on February 2017. 2) In the event that the Defendant delays to pay interest for more than two months, the Plaintiff may request the Defendant to pay the full amount of the instant loan.

B. From May 25, 2016, the Defendant did not pay interest until now.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant delayed the payment of interest on the loan of this case for at least two months, and it is evident in the record that the plaintiff sought payment of the total amount of loan of this case against the defendant in the application for the payment order of this case. As such, the defendant is obligated to pay the interest or delay damages calculated at the rate of 10% per annum from May 25, 2016 to September 22, 2016, the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order of this case (=750,000 won x 12 months/90,0000 won x 100% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment).

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is justified.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.