logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.10.14 2020고단2850
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

On May 20, 2020, the Defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on May 20, 202, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 28, 2020.

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million for a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the District Court of the Republic of Korea.

On April 25, 2020, around 10:43, the Defendant driven a e-learning car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.039% from the 10-meter section from the Defendant’s house front of the city B apartment Cdong to the roads front of the Yangju city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the status of the driver, and investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver);

1. Investigation reports on criminal records, etc. (A), reporting on the results of dispositions before and after confirmation, and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the defendant's statutory statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 피고인이 두 번� 음주운전 범행으로 적발된 것이나, 종전 처벌전력이 2008.경으로 이 사건으로부터 12년 가량 경과한 점, 이 사건 당시 피고인의 혈중알콜농도가 0.039%이며 이른바 숙취운전 사안인 점, 이 사건 범행은 판시 범죄전력의 절도죄 등과 형법 제37조 후단의 경합범관계에 있어 동시에 판결할 경우와의 형평을 고려하여야 하는 점, 그 밖에 피고인의 연령과 성행, 가족관계, 범행의 동기와 수단, 범행 후 정황 등 이 사건 기록과 변론에 나타난 여러 양형조건을 종합적으로 고려하여 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.

arrow