1. The plaintiff's appeal and the additional selective claims filed by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is as follows, except for the cases where part of the facts are rewritten or added as follows, and it is identical to the part of “1. Basic Facts” from 6 to 4.2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.

[Supplementary or supplementary parts] Nos. 6 through 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.

A. The real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter referred to as “instant church building”)

After the completion of the new construction work by the Plaintiff, on December 28, 1994, the registration of ownership preservation was completed in the name of E’s spouse, who is the defendant’s standing tree.

B. For the payment of the construction price to the Plaintiff, the issuer F, the date of issuance, July 21, 1995, and the date of payment 196;

8. Promissory Notes in Seoul, the payee, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff at par value of KRW 227,00,000 (hereinafter “ Promissory Notes in this case”) were delivered.

In the second instance judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court shall conduct the following first to third to fifth. D.

G A on October 9, 1998, filed a lawsuit against F, a title holder of the Promissory Notes, seeking payment of the face value of the Promissory Notes of Seoul District Court at KRW 227,00,000,000, and damages for delay. The said court on January 15, 1999, filed the lawsuit against F, a title holder of the Promissory Notes, to whom the Promissory Notes were issued.

As stated in paragraph (1), G accepted the defense that 15,00,000 won was repaid to G, and the remaining 212,00,000,000 won (hereinafter “the Promissory Notes”) and the decision was rendered that excluding this, paid 6% per annum from October 26, 1996 to October 20, 198, and 25% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following "No. 26, 2007" and "No. 14, 2018" of the first instance judgment are as follows: