logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.27 2013나50731
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of the claim - In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in the statement in the evidence No. 1-6, the Plaintiff, who was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling electronic components in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “D” in the name of “D”, can be recognized as the fact that the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant, who was engaged in the business of manufacturing electrical appliances from March 2, 2010 to April 201, which was manufactured by the Seoul semiconductor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul semiconductor”) for the Defendant from March 2010 to April 201, the fact that the amount for which the Defendant did not pay ELD to the Plaintiff was 71,186,060.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant, who is the purchaser of the above ELD, is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the unpaid amount of KRW 71,186,060 and delay damages, unless there are special circumstances to the plaintiff.

2. Determination of set-off against damage claim

A. The defendant's assertion that the defendant produced and installed the advertising box in the Seoul subway history, and used the advertising box as a part of the plaintiff's parts. The advertising box was not functioning properly because the front color of the advertising board is not equal due to the defect of the ELD supplied by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the defendant was installed in the printed circuit board (PCB) manufactured by using the plaintiff's ELD manufacturer supplied by the plaintiff. The 150 to 220 ELD cards were installed in the printed circuit board, and the advertisement board was placed in the advertisement box and the advertisement board was placed in the advertisement board. The 150 to 220 ELD cards were removed from other companies, other than the plaintiff, and the ELD manufacturer was supplied with the ELD manufacturer and newly manufactured the ELDr's f.83,68,708,70 ELD, and the ELD manufacturer and the above 43081,296 486,2964,2869.

arrow