The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspended execution) by the lower court is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Among the crimes of this case, the part of defraudation of the corporate bonds investment funds in the name of the crime of this case is not good for the crime of deception by deceiving the purpose of borrowing, etc., and the fact that the defendant has been punished by a fine several times for the same kind of crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, considering the fact that the defendant has led to the trial of the case, all of the crime of this case is confessioned and against all of the crime of this case, the part of the crime of this case, which acquired money in the name of the purchase price of the product of this case, appears to have been actually prepared for the clothing business, etc., that the defendant does not want the punishment, that the defendant does not want the punishment, that the health of the parents supported by the defendant is not good, and that the social ties relationship of the defendant is obvious, and that the defendant's social ties relationship is obvious, and that the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means, consequence, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.