The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal alleged mistake of facts, misapprehension of legal principles, or improper order of disclosure notification due to the initial grounds for appeal, but withdrawn such assertion on the first trial date of this court.

Unfair sentencing: The sentence of the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment, and four years of suspended execution) is too heavy.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed each of the crimes of this case among the crimes of this case among the crimes of this case, on the ground that the victim, who was in a marital relationship with another man, under the influence of alcohol, was able to have been in conflict.

The defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect each of the crimes of this case, and after committing the crime, he tried to minimize the shock and suffering of the victim by arranging the relationship with the victim according to the victim's will.

After agreement with the defendant, the victim also wanted to take measures against the defendant.

After having been punished as a juvenile offender in 1980, the defendant has no record of criminal records or records of the same kind exceeding the fine until now.

However, the defendant, who is a dangerous object, detained the victim by threatening the victim in two kitchen knife, and committed indecent acts by force by force against the victim by using the tool, paper, etc. during the course of the confinement.

Although it was about 13 years ago, the defendant's core mind that he had been subject to the sexual intercourse of the victim who had been in a relationship with the victim for about 13 years.

Even if each of the crimes of this case is committed by the defendant with only his own appraisal before it is used as a violent method, and it is sufficient to punish the defendant as a result of a serious ambiguity of human dignity and personality of the victim.

The victim, as a result of each of the crimes of this case, she was suffering from the threat of life at the time, and she was living in the defendant's house for about a week as the defendant did, and was not able to return home.

The victim agreed with the defendant and did not want to punish the defendant, but the victim is due to each of the crimes of this case.