logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.09.27 2017고단1968
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who intends to arrange, solicit, induce, or compel an unspecified person to accept money, valuables, or other property benefits, in return for promising to do so;

Nevertheless, the defendant from March 31, 2017 to the same year.

6. From 14th to 14th, by operating a commercial sex business establishment with the trade name of “E” on the D and the 1st underground floor of Sin He had employed a female sexual traffic, and by having sexual intercourse with the customer receiving 120,000 won of the sexual traffic price, the customer arranged sexual intercourse.

2. In order to assist the above A in arranging sexual traffic as seen above, Defendant B: (a) provided that, in the above E, the carper shall be seen as if the above A did not exist in order to assist the said A in arranging sexual traffic; (b) provided that, around April 20, 2017, the police officer who visited the above establishment at around 120,000 won received 120,000 won as chemical freight and had sexual intercourse with the F for employees engaged in sexual traffic; (c) on June 14, 2017, around 20:50, the Defendant B aided and abetted the above crime of A by facilitating sexual traffic, such as allowing the said police officer to receive 120,000 won from the police officer who visited the above establishment and to engage in sexual intercourse with G workers engaged in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of F and G preparation;

1. Application of the statutes applicable to the attachment of control photographs of each field and field photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and selection of imprisonment;

B. Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts; Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 19(

1. Defendant B who is eligible for mitigation: Article 32(2) and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (after the Defendants’ continuous brokerage of sexual traffic even after the control over the intermediation of sexual traffic, the Defendants were led to the confession of the Defendants, and the Defendants did not have any punishment exceeding the fine).

arrow