A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 771] The Defendant, around 13:00 on June 17, 2014, reported that the victim F (n, 52 years of age) did a dispute over the E convenience store located in Seosan City D with G, his father, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor and take the victim’s desire to do so by hand, and caused the victim to inflict an injury, such as the spiting of the right arms that require treatment for about 21 days on the face of the victim, by spiting the victim’s face.

[2014 Highest 919] The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a H highest car.

On July 23, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on July 16:15, 2014, and led to a two-lane road in the vicinity of the bus stops in the Geumsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, by using the two-lane road along the length of the new erogic distance, along one-lane from the length of the new erogic distance.

At that time, the Defendant, prior to the same direction, was followed by the J-Poter cargo vehicle driven by the victim I (the age of 47). Therefore, the Defendant had a duty of care to care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly examining the situation of the vehicle before a person engaged in driving business, and thoroughly taking the duty of care to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty at the front time, discovered the above cargo vehicle due to the negligence of driving on a stroke, and took an urgent action, but did not stop, and received the above cargo vehicle back to the front part of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury, such as dynaf in the bones of the verte, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, while at the same time, 2,857,731 won, such as the exchange of the above dynaf, destroyed the cargo of the victim, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 771]

1. The defendant;