A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year for a violation of fraud and the Attorney-at-Law Act in the credit branch of Suwon District Court on June 5, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th day of the same month, and is currently serving

(E) On December 22, 2015, the Defendant was working as a technician repairing speculative game apparatus from 1974 to 1996 and was operating a game producing company called “E”. The Defendant was a person who had a certain share in the “E”.

From 192 to 192, the Defendant had been aware of the fact with F that there was no permission to manufacture the speculative game machine (i.e., one’s own slot machine) and that no preparation was made to obtain permission to produce the speculative game machine, and thus, he could not obtain permission to produce the speculative game machine. However, he had displayed the receipt of the false National Police Agency and the Game Rating Board, the receipt of various business plans, agreements, contracts, etc. against each person around his surroundings, displayed the receipt of the false National Police Agency and the Game Rating Board, various business plans, agreements, contracts, etc., and had taken the money by deceiving him as if he was to obtain permission to produce the speculative game machine, and had the money taken by deceiving him as if he was to use it for various living expenses, expenses, etc.

F The public bid with the Defendant and the victim G who was well aware of money, and around July 31, 2009, the F showed the receipt in the name of the Commissioner General of the Cyber Police Agency prepared falsely to the victim at a coffee shop with no knowledge of the trade name in the direction of the victim in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju-gu, and "F knows A (Defendant) while engaging in the work of manufacturing amusement machines for several years in Seoul," and he operates the factory as a machine manufacturer and performs the work related to the permission of amusement machines.

A (Defendants) has developed, and is legitimate, amusement machines which can be operated in not less than three tourist hotels in the Rose of Sharon.