1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The appeal cost is borne by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted in the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, in addition to adding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the damage that the Defendants asserted additionally while partially reducing the claim of counter-claim in the trial, not only the part of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 6, No. 20 but also the part of the "additional Claim and Judgment" as set forth in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus,

2. Additional assertion and determination of the Defendants are as follows: (a) damages equivalent to KRW 13,824,00 due to the Plaintiff’s tort amounting to KRW 13,824,00 (4-year rent of KRW 2,740,00 for land rent of KRW 1,50,00 for retirement expenses of KRW 1,50,00 for KRW 1,50,000 for KRW 1,75,00 for purchase expenses of KRW 1,50,00 for KRW 1,75,00 for KRW 1,00 for KRW 920 for KRW 1,00 for purchase expenses of KRW 1,00 for KRW 1,012,00 for KRW 18,00 for rice straw of KRW 18,70,00 for KRW 6,30,00 for KRW 3,730,00 for initial work expenses; (b) however, there is no evidence that the Defendants submitted to the Defendants’ tort.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the appeal by the Defendants is dismissed in its entirety, and it is so decided as per Disposition.