logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고합144
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

In addition, from August 207, 2007, the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is a child welfare facility that provides after-school care services in Jeju to C or D (round August 31, 2015, the location of the above center was transferred from C to D) and is actually operating the above child center.

1. Crimes against the victim F;

A. On July 2015, the Defendant discovered the Victim F (10 years of age) belonging to the “E Center” located in Jeju-si, which divided conversations with other students from “E Center”, and committed an indecent act by force against the victim, who is a minor under the age of 13.

B. In 2015, the Defendant, at the “E Center” group counseling room located in the “E Center” counseling room located in the Jeju-si, was found to have both other students returned home and the victim F remains mixed, committed an indecent act. The Defendant: (a) kiddds the victim with double arms; (b) kidds the victim with double arms; (c) kids the victim’s khym with one hand; and (d) kids the victim, who is minor under the age of 13, by force.

2. Crimes against the victim G;

A. The Defendant, around 2015, stated that “A or D victim G was placed in an elementary school at the sixth grade (2015) office at the time of the police investigation,” but did not memory specific time when the act was committed.

Accordingly, the prosecutor specified the date and time of the crime in around 2015, and specified the place of crime as D at Jeju, and the defendant also recognized this part of the charges.

However, around August 31, 2015, the E Center cannot specify the place of crime as stated in the indictment by moving its office around August 31, 2015, and even if the place of crime is selectively stated as above, there is no impediment to the exercise of the defendant's right to defense. Therefore, it is without modification

arrow