beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a driver C 125cc Oba.
On August 29, 2014, at around 18:10, the Defendant started from the old city Dobbbb, in front of the old city Dob, in the old city located in the old city, the elderly Dob, the elderly Dob, the Defendant, at around 300 meters of the distance of about 300 meters from the front of the Dob, the place where the Defendant was in charge of the operation of the above Dobbb. At that time, G while working in the Dobb, G and the reduced H showed around 10 meters in a distance of about 10 meters from the above Doba, and observed the Defendant’s operation of the Dobba, and was under confirmation as to whether he was drunk, and was under significant grounds to suspect that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, and her face, and was demanded to take a drinking test by voluntarily accompanying the Fbab.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, refused to comply with the demands for a lawful drinking test conducted by the police officer I (from August 29, 2014 to August 18:35 of the same day) assigned by the F police box.
Summary of Evidence
1. Witnesses G and I's respective legal statements;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;
1. Application of the CCTV CD reproduction legislation in this Act
1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, and selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, the defendant's voluntary act was conducted by the defendant's voluntary intent, and the request for the measurement of alcohol was lawful. Thus, the above argument is without merit.
(i) The police officers are under the influence of alcohol and drive Oral alba.