All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment, and one year and six months of confiscation) is too unreasonable, and the reasons for appeal by the prosecutor are deemed to be too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant, while recognizing the fact that the Defendant constitutes the crime of Bophishing, was involved in the instant crime, and that the number of physical cards kept in custody after delivery, shows the attitude that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, there was no record of punishment for the same crime, and that there was no record of agreement with the victim of fraud at the time of the trial.

In full view of the circumstances above, comprehensively taking into account the circumstances that led to the Defendant to commit the crime, the age, health condition, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances that constitute the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s above assertion are not acceptable on the grounds that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal of this case by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal of this case are without merit. It is so decided