All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (the imprisonment of three years, the completion of sexual assault treatment programs for forty hours, and the disclosure of information for four years) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the Prosecutor by the lower court to the Defendants is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine both the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s assertion.

There are favorable circumstances for the Defendants, such as the confession of the instant crime and the mistake against the Defendants, and there was no record of criminal punishment, and the Defendants were minors at the time of the instant crime and agreed with the victims.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed by the defendants in collaboration with other accomplices, and the crime of this case is committed against the defendant, such as that the defendants 14 years old drinking alcohol to a victim under the age of 14, and the crime is not very good in light of the result or method of the crime, and that the victim received considerable mental or physical shock.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances and the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s above assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.