1. The defendant-Counterclaim plaintiff's appeal and the defendant-Counterclaim claim filed in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2...

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the insured C with respect to D low-priced vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned vehicles”). From October 21, 2012 to October 21, 2013, the insurance period is from October 21, 2013.

B. Around 14:09 on August 19, 2013, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and making a left-hand turn to the intersection of a natural resources research institute located in the Daejeon Pungdong Family-dong from the geological resources research institute on the surface of the geological resources research institute, the said intersection met the front part of the Defendant’s driving license plate of the 125cc-wheeled vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) that was straight along three-lanes on the stop signal from the surface of the chill road to the chilling side of the straight distance from the surface of the geological resources research institute.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

In the instant accident, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the mouths of the right slots, the escapes, etc. requiring treatment for about 8 weeks, and E, which was on board the back seat of the Defendant vehicle, suffered bodily injury, such as approximately 16 weeks after the right visvise, the right visvise, the right visvise, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Existence of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff was negligent in the occurrence of the instant accident due to the Defendant’s negligence in violation of the stop signal, and as B was left left or left according to the left turn signal, there was no negligence in the occurrence of the instant accident.

Therefore, the plaintiff, the insurer of the plaintiff vehicle, does not have a duty to compensate the defendant for damages caused by the accident of this case.

In this regard, the defendant has been negligent in entering the intersection by passing a stop line on yellow signal, entering the intersection by a part of the guiding line for left-hand turn, and the above negligence was caused by the accident in this case.